New Jersey trial and New Jersey appeal lawyer

Jeff Mandel- the lawyer other lawyers select when they seek a New Jersey appeal lawyer

For the firm website, click here 

Jeffrey Mandel 

To see if Jeff Mandel is interested in your case, email Jeffrey S. Mandel, Esq. at jeff@jsmlawfirm.com.


For information on a New Jersey appeal, visit www.njappeal.com.

___________________________________________________________

O’Boyle v. Borough of Longport, 218 N.J. 168 (2014). Argued before the Supreme Court of New Jersey issues related to the joint defense privilege and the scope of production under the Open Public Records Act.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Gaitan, 209 N.J. 339 (2012). Argued before the Supreme Court of New Jersey whether cases requiring defense counsel to provide adequate advice on immigration consequences of a guilty plea should be applied retroactively.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Goulbourne, 209 N.J. 339 (2012). Consolidated with Gaitan and incorporated the argument of defense counsel’s duty to provide adequate advice on immigration consequences.
___________________________________________________________

Mazdabrook Commons HOA v. Kahn, 210 N.J. 482 (2012). Argued before the Supreme Court of New Jersey the rights of a HOA to limit on-site political speech, thereby implicating the 1st Amendment free speech clause.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Tedesco, 214 N.J. 177 (2013). Argued before the Supreme Court of New Jersey the right of a defendant convicted of murder to waive his appearance at sentencing.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Jimenez, 188 N.J. 390 (2006). Argued before the Supreme Court of New Jersey the constitutionality of procedures used for determining death penalty eligibility when one asserts mental disability.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Jaffe, 220 N.J. 114 (2014). Argued before the Supreme Court of New Jersey whether a sentencing court may consider mitigating evidence arising between the plea and sentencing.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Nuñez-Valdéz, 200 N.J. 129 (2009). Argued before the Supreme Court of New Jersey that a non-citizen must be properly notified of the deportation consequences of the plea. The Court adopted my proposal for modifying the State’s Plea Form, and modified the Arraignment/Status Conference Order.
___________________________________________________________

Stengart v. Loving Care Agency, Inc., 201 N.J. 300 (2010). Addressed before the Supreme Court of New Jersey whether an employee waives the attorney-client privilege by communicating with counsel through a company-owned computer when the employee accesses the computer with a private password.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Parks, 192 N.J. 483 (2007). Argued before the Supreme Court of New Jersey the unconstitutionality of certain procedures for imposing a life sentence under the Three Strikes Law.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Mahoney, 188 N.J. 359 (2006). Argued before the Supreme Court of New Jersey that an attorney’s conviction should be overturned for theft, misappropriating funds, and forgery. Case implicated jury charges and the use of the Rules of Professional Conduct against a lawyer.
___________________________________________________________

Winstock v. Galasso, 430 N.J. Super. 391 (App. Div. 2013). Addressed whether entry into a guilty plea or diversionary program prevents a former client from suing for legal malpractice.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Western World, Inc., 440 N.J. Super. 175 (App. Div. 2015). Argued before the Appellate Division the right of a corporation to representation by the Office of the Public Defender when the corporation itself is charged with a crime.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Spell, 196 N.J. 537 (2008). Argued before the Supreme Court of New Jersey the circumstances under the Implied Consent law in which law enforcement who arrest a motorist for Driving While Intoxicated must read the entire Motor Vehicle Commission Standard Statement for Operation of a Motor Vehicle.
___________________________________________________________

Cashin v. Bello, 223 N.J. 328 (2015). Addressed before the Supreme Court of New Jersey legislative intent and interpretation under the good cause exception for eviction of a residential tenant.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Cottle, 194 N.J. 449 (2008). Argued before the Supreme Court of New Jersey the circumstances in which an attorney is required to disclose, and seek a waiver of, a potential conflict of interest while representing a defendant in a criminal matter when the attorney is under indictment.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Bishop, 429 N.J. Super. 533 (App. Div. 2013). Addressed whether the State waives its right to demand an extended term or parole ineligibility on resentencing upon a permanent revocation of special probation.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Marquez, 202 N.J. 485 (2010). Argued before the Supreme Court of New Jersey that, if the State allows motorists to take the drivers’ examination in Spanish, the DWI refusal statute must be conveyed in Spanish.
___________________________________________________________

State in the Interest of S.S., 183 N.J. 20 (2005). Argued before the Supreme Court of New Jersey that a judge lacks the authority to hold a juvenile in criminal contempt for violating an order issued pursuant to a family-in-crisis petition.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Torres, 429 N.J. Super. 533 (App. Div. 2013). Consolidated with Bishop. Addressed whether the State waives its right to demand an extended term or parole ineligibility on resentencing upon a permanent revocation of special probation.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Schmidt, 206 N.J. 71 (2011). Argued before the Supreme Court of New Jersey that the entire Motor Vehicle Commission Standard Statement for Operation of a Motor Vehicle must be read prior to charging refusal if the motorist consents to providing a breath sample but provides an insufficient sample.
___________________________________________________________

State in the Interest of A.B., 219 N.J. 542 (2014). Argued before the Supreme Court of New Jersey the Defendant’s right to obtain court-ordered access to a private residence where a crime allegedly occurred.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Randolph, 210 N.J. 330 (2012). Addressed before the Supreme Court of New Jersey whether a trial court on re-sentencing, after a successful appeal, may consider post-conviction rehabilitative conduct to reduce the sentence.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Earls, 214 N.J. 564 (2013). Addressed before the Supreme Court of New Jersey whether law enforcement required a search warrant to access information from defendant’s cellular telephone service provider.
___________________________________________________________

State v. Grate, 220 N.J. 317 (2014). Addressed before the Supreme Court of New Jersey the mens rea required prior to being convicted of possessing a firearm on an educational institution.
___________________________________________________________

Though not a solicitation being sent to you, this web site may be considered an ADVERTISEMENT. Before making your choice of attorney, you should give this matter careful thought. The selection of an attorney is an important decision. If you believe this web site is inaccurate or misleading, you may report same to the Committee on Attorney Advertising, Hughes Justice Complex, CN 037, Trenton, NJ 08625.